International Project Management Association (IPMA) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the IPMA Exam with flashcards and multiple-choice questions featuring hints and explanations. Ace your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


When is it advisable to use a probability-impact matrix for risk prioritization?

  1. When management wants to include urgency in analysis

  2. When it is difficult to estimate probabilities and impacts precisely

  3. When the team seeks to avoid most risks

  4. When the customer has a high risk tolerance

The correct answer is: When it is difficult to estimate probabilities and impacts precisely

Using a probability-impact matrix for risk prioritization is particularly advisable when it is difficult to estimate probabilities and impacts precisely. This tool provides a structured way to assess risks even in the absence of exact data. The matrix allows teams to categorize risks based on qualitative evaluations of their likelihood and potential impact, rather than relying solely on precise numerical estimates. In scenarios where exact quantifications are challenging due to uncertainty or lack of historical data, a probability-impact matrix enables project managers and teams to focus on the relative significance of different risks. By assigning qualitative values or ranges to the probabilities and impacts, teams can effectively prioritize risks and decide on the necessary response strategies without getting bogged down by incomplete data. This approach is especially useful in complex projects or new domains where previous experience may not be directly applicable, making it easier to navigate uncertainties. Thus, the use of a probability-impact matrix serves to enhance decision-making under uncertainty, facilitating a more pragmatic approach to risk management.